16 Responses

1. MARvelous

   April 28th, 2008 at 12:33 am

   1

   She probably loved every minute of it.

   Honestly, that combined with those myspace pictures, I wouldn’t be surprised if we saw her as the next pregnant teen under 18.

2. k

   April 28th, 2008 at 2:19 am

   2

   she has that “come seduce me “look..not cool for a disney star…lol

   ah well..back to being popular and rich!

3. Kelly_y0

   April 28th, 2008 at 10:54 am

   3

   Is it just me, or does she look like shes dead?!

4. ~b

   April 28th, 2008 at 11:01 am

   4

   The parents of these kids need to be kicked. WTCrap!?!?!? Yeah sorry but she has white trash whore written all over her face….even with close on, yuk…

   
   (sorry a little moody today -lol-)

5. lisa

   April 28th, 2008 at 12:26 pm

   5

   Ok i agree this is not tasteful and it is very much not approiated for a teen star, but lets report all of the facts.. she was never topless during this photo shoot.. she had wrap/shirt on and it was photo edited out. And also lets think about this shes 15 and its vanity fair, she prolly didnt think or make such a good decision. And who knows where shell be at 18 if shell even still be popular it may have been her only chance to do the cover, with all that said I blame her parents who are the ones who are suppose to protect you and guide you to make intelligent decision, and I blame vanity fair who obvisiously cared more about the copies sold than their credibility, they made that obvisious when they decided to created child porn! But one thing I most disagree on is the fact that everyone above wants to call her a whore.. if you think back when you were that age im sure you made bad decisions too, and yet you hear all this talk about the industries setting such bad examples and such negative imgages to young girls but yet NO ONE has said anything about the negative additude, negative words, negative relationships..ect..girls have towards each other… I think that what shoud be adressed before anything! Girls should think before using those words, and yet we wonder why guys have no problem using slut? whore?…ect? If really thought about it we have no right getting mad about it because GIRLS are the first ones to throw them out there!

6. Lindsay

   April 28th, 2008 at 2:54 pm

   6

   She definitely DOES look like she’s dead. Not particularly flattering…

7. pinksalute

   April 28th, 2008 at 3:51 pm

   7

   I hate it when kids are used as sexual pawns.

   Her parents just sat back and let it happen.

   I feel bad for her.
   She was used.

8. IVY

   April 28th, 2008 at 3:57 pm

   8

   MILEY is BACKLESS !! NOT TOPLESS!! THe last time someone was TOPLESS meant she had No clothing on her chest. I believe you know that to. So, Say it as it is BACKLESS> By the way I saw some outtake shots and for your info- she is fully dressed. SORRY to burst your bubble!!

9. Sarah

   April 28th, 2008 at 4:14 pm

   9

   SKANKKKKKK!

10. Cathy

    April 28th, 2008 at 6:25 pm

    10

    I thought that her father was constantly with her to prevent things like this from happening. And you knowthat this is bad when it is on the news and the national news shows in the morning… It’s sick that someone thought that it would be either artistic or in good taste at 15.

11. ~b

    April 28th, 2008 at 6:29 pm

    11

    Okay so maybe saying “whore” was harsh BUT I have a daughter 3 and son 4 and all the little kids at his preschool KNOW who she is. She has hoochy pictures of her self everywhere. You know where she is headed!!! I think its sad that is never fails Disney “raises” some bad examples for our children!!!! I dont want my little girl to look up to girls like this. Whether she is naked in those pictures or not.
    She bugs the crap out of me anyways, she can hardly speak properly her mom…..well lets just say now I can see why she let her daughter do that photoshoot anyways.

12. jmeeem

    April 28th, 2008 at 8:34 pm

    12

    artistic, yes… for like, Uma Thurman or Kate Moss… but, a little girl at 15? I know what being 15 is like and… seriously, she is hook, line and sinker into a messy future.

13. Sharon

    April 29th, 2008 at 1:00 am

    13

    skanky little ho waiting to happen… and her parents watched and let this happen? that’s sick.. and her pictures with her dad are sick too… F*CKED UP!!!

14. Sharon

    April 29th, 2008 at 1:01 am

    14

    skanky little ho waiting to happen… and her parents watched and let this happen? that’s sick.. and her pictures with her dad are sick too..

15. Anonymous

    April 29th, 2008 at 1:19 am

    15

    You guys talk about her being such a bad example, since when?? Her songs are all about being yourself and real life things that young girls go through…how is that setting a bad example?? My 6 year old loves her to death and i dont really think she did anything that bad. People are making it out as if she was in play boy or something. Im sure half of you have done worse when you were her age, it just wasnt broadcasted all over the world.

16. Dakota Smith

    April 29th, 2008 at 7:32 am

    16

    Look, it’s really simple: Miley Cyrus has three target demographics: tweens, teens, and pedophiles. That’s just a fact of life. Appealing to the pedophiles is why they release these “leaked” photos of Miley in her underwear from time to time.

    The Vanity Fair pic is just another means to attract that pedophile audience that’s already following her. It’s intentional, calculated, and every adult involved with the photo knows it.

    Now, frankly, I think that any father who’d whore out his 15-year-old daughter to attract pedophiles deserves to be shot. There’s no amount of money you could give me to whore out my daughters to pedophiles. But then, I have ethics.

    Here’s how this is going to all go down: for the next three years, “leaked” photos are going to find their way to the net. These will eventually include pics of Miley’s bare breasts and vagina.

    After she’s 18 and no longer particularly interesting to her target market, she’ll fall from stardom and become the next Lindsay Lohan.