Bridget Moynahan took her baby boy to church… What’s his name again? John Jacob Jingle Heimer Schmit da da da da da da da da???Â
No, it’s John Edward Thomas Moynahan. I understand why she didn’t give the kid Tom Brady’s last name… but we’re all assuming the Thomas is after Tom… but just to rub it in a little more, she put the Edward before the Thomas. This is just a weird situation all around.
12 Responses
Keedee
October 2nd, 2007 at 12:58 am
1He’s a BIG boy. It’s rather nice to see them going to church.
sad
October 2nd, 2007 at 6:23 am
2Bridget is unreal! She poses on OK! with her adorable innocent baby and now she is staging paparazzi moments going into CHURCH!?!?! Amazing how she is using this situation for her own self-serving purposes. The baby should have the father’s last name! She she tried to trap him and he denied her, I guess this is her way of punishing him; move to LA, give your son your last name, and pose on OK! with a pathetic headline ‘life without daddy’! All she continue to do is look bitter bitter bitter. Pretty sad, but I guess Tom Brady is hard to get over. She is still obviously madly in love with the guy. Karma sucks Bridget, never try to get what you want by deceiving someone. It does not work!
Lindsay
October 2nd, 2007 at 6:58 am
3Tom Brady’s full name is Thomas Edward Brady. What I don’t get is why would she give the baby Tom’s first name and middle name as his middle names but didn’t give him Tom’s last name? Weird.
jessica
October 2nd, 2007 at 10:55 am
4she always looks uncomfortable holding the baby to me. It just looks like she is throwing a sack of potatoes over her should and not holding him on her chest where he would probably be more comfortable.
JUDY
October 2nd, 2007 at 1:21 pm
5Just because he is the father doesn’t mean she should have to give him the last name. Maybe he doesn’t deserve it. Did he offer any support during her pregnancy?
She got pregnant during the end of the relationship, that doesn’t mean she was trying to trap him.
Maybe if Tom spent a little time and effort into caring about the condition of his child’s mother during the pregnancy, she would have spent a little time and effort into naming the baby after a concerned father.
You get what you give.
And Tom’s lovely lady thought it was ok to send a t-shirt to the unborn baby that said Supermodel.
What a bitch. Maybe Tom can blame his insiensitive girlfriend for his problems.
Rick
October 2nd, 2007 at 1:42 pm
6It’s fairly obvious Bridget (Kat to her friends) deceived Brady in getting pregnant (early November for the counters). She was (is) very much in love with Tom, is now 37, and saw the relationship going south. Tom left her in late November, not realizing she was pregnant. When she told him in December, he was furious. That stated, I do have empathy for her and realize she hoped that a pregnancy would result in marriage. Both Irish Catholic, neither ever married and love does overcome logic for many of us.
For the watchers, something is either afoot in the way of an agreement or a planned standoff at this juncture. Neither has filed for child support, visitation which would immediately be reported by the media from any legal news filing. Further, Bridget declined any interviews, including OK magazine with Tom being equally mute on any comments. An unsubstantiated report had Tom supposedly in LA last week seeing baby John, but this is not likely in my estimation.
The coming weeks will reveal a lot more in the way of concrete news that is reliable. I don’t envision a reconciliation, although the romantic side of my persona would be happy if there was. It’s far from likely, however. What’s definite is that Brady will see his son, although extremely difficult currently due to playing in the NFL. Possibly the Pats bye week coming up will reveal more. On a final note, I do commend both parents to date for not airing their laundry in public.
hoyachick
October 2nd, 2007 at 10:07 pm
7yeah go to church now after fornicating/having premarital sex and having a bastard child out of wed lock, I swear these celebrities are so tacky nothing they do amazes me
Jen
October 2nd, 2007 at 10:47 pm
8What can I say Payback is a bitch
kammy
October 3rd, 2007 at 6:11 am
9Tom WAS in LA. ESPN said they talked to him and he said he was in LA for his day off on Monday. I don’t like Bridget. I really don’t. she made it clear that she wanted to marry tom. and Tom made it clear that he was waiting until his Football career slowed down to get married, but she couldn’t wait so she tried to trap him. I remeber when I, Robot came out and all the engagement rumors were going around, all Bridget’s people would say was “no comment” about it, knowing good and well they were fueling the rumor up. It wasn’t until Tom said they weren’t engaged when they finally started denying the rumors. She’s pathetic for doing this if you ask me…
Maria carla
October 3rd, 2007 at 10:07 am
10I see that all the Bridget-haters are already here.
************************
1. As the child will live with Moynahan she gave the child HER name. How awful is it for a child when you don’t share your mum’s last name and the name-giver deadbeat dad is never around? Sharing the same last name does support the “i-belong-to-this-family” – feeling.
************************
2. Bridget HAD to present her son to the media some day. All celebrity babies do debut that way. It takes a lot of pressure out of the situation because no photographer tries to push his way through to get the “famous first pic”.
What is Bridget supposed to do? Hide herself and her son from pregnancy till college?
***********************
3. Bridget didn’t say one bad word about Brady or Gis. But Brady and Gis did say a lot of nasty things (statements about abortion or “the right order”/sluts) and they did many bad things (sending a “supermodel” onsie).
Bridget did not give an interview to OK magazine when she saw what the magazine inteded to write (“deadbeat dad” or “supermodel slut” etc). As a matter of fact: celebs don’t have any legal possibilities to “force” a magazine to run a story a certain way. They try but as one could see in the Angelina-interview it doesn’t work very well. (unicef: Angie tried to make reporters sign a shut-up-statement saying that no questions except her movies or her charity work were allowed).
***********************
4. If Bridget wants to go to church she is free to do that. Maybe she looks for a “christian toddler group” where she can share experiences with other women… . Maybe she wanted to see a church where she wants to baptize her baby.
Whatever.
What did Tom do meanwhile? Presenting his supermodel squeeze everywhere… . Now that is style…
aloha_blu
October 3rd, 2007 at 6:42 pm
11the rub-in is she named the baby john edward thomas…as in JET! tom plays for the new england patriots and evidently, miss moynahan roots for the new york jets, lmao, gotta love it!
Holly
October 5th, 2007 at 7:35 pm
12Tom and Gisele have NEVER commented on this situation. Giseles comments on abortion were not related to this. Grow up and get your facts straight!
Bridget is not a celebrity that is sought after, but this baby is sought after due to the fame status of the father. This baby had no right to be on OK!. She is pathetic in the way she is handling this.
Going to church with the baby is all for show. Since when to the paps hang out at church? They don’t unless your people call them ahead of time to make sure they get the shot.
Ugh, I really cannot stand her!
Video
Categories
Favorite Dirt Links
Friends
On The Air...
Meta